Define Jobs with Precision

Posted by Frederic Lucas-Conwell

Define Jobs with Precision

In his best-selling book, Good to Great, Jim Collins considers what propels companies to succeed and arrives at this conclusion: running an organization is like driving a bus; the driver has to make sure the right people are on the bus in the right seats.

That analogy, which has since become well known, challenges us to pay more attention not only to the leaders of companies, but also to individual team members and how they are each paired with the right job.

This focus, however, does not change how difficult it is to distinguish which characteristics are needed to qualify a person for a specific job or match them with a specific team or manager.

Yet the hiring process often focuses solely on the prospective candidates and their patchwork of talents. Organizations must use data about their behavior to evaluate how responsibilities and skills should be expressed and developed for a specific position.

Why is it critical to look at the positions individuals take on and not merely the individuals themselves?

Because if you want people to succeed in their positions in practice, not just in the abstract, you must examine what the position requires of them. That’s what we typically do when we list the competencies expected in a job. We assume we will find candidates with matching competencies.

As we evidence with the GRI, behavioral/emotional characteristics do not adapt at will.

When the behavioral requirements of a position are too distant from an individual’s natural behavior, this leads to unnecessary tension, lack of motivation and flow, disengagement, and finally, underperformance.

For that reason, a more refined understanding of the behavioral/emotional demand in a given position helps to better anticipate the corresponding characteristics needed in prospective candidates and the assistance that individuals may need to adjust if their profile is not an ideal match for the position.

Focusing on positions rather than on their occupants has proven to be a powerful way of engaging strategic discussions on what may be missing in an organization at any level, how to attract and keep the best talent, and when to open jobs for candidates who don’t have the required competencies, yet show the desired behavioral/emotional attributes.

Explore how you can define jobs with precision with the GRI. Read chapter 14 of Lead Beyond Intuition: How to Build a High-Performing Organization. Order the book on Amazon today.

Latest Posts

Building Hard-Core Soft Leadership Skills

Soft skills are in higher demand than ever. In a world where automation and machine learning are starting to take over the menial, rote tasks at work, soft skills are becoming...

Reduce Friction and Promote Teamwork - Part 1

Organizational friction leads to a loss of engagement and productivity that ultimately impacts the bottom line negatively. It is unnecessary and can be prevented. In this...

Build Teams more Effectively

Understanding and predicting how several people perform together as a team is more challenging than understanding a single employee’s behavior. When managers have data...

Define Jobs with Precision

The hiring process often focuses solely on candidates’ patchwork of talents. Organizations must use data about their behavior, and the behaviors that are required in the...

Lead Beyond Intuition

How to Build a High-Performing Organization

Order Now

Connect with Growth Resources

Complete the form, and we will contact you to discuss how we can assist you and your company.